${item.excerpt}
Featured in ${item.section}
Have you received an academic integrity allegation from Deakin University? Our experienced Advocacy team are here to help you.
Deakin University defines academic integrity as “part of the moral code of academia” and involving “using, generating and communicating information in an ethical, honest and responsible manner”. (Student Academic Integrity Policy, s6).
Examples of breaches include: Plagiarism, Contract cheating, Collusion, Impersonation, Falsification, fabrication or misrepresentation of data or information, Academic fraud, Non-compliance with instructions or requirements in an invigilated or supervised assessment, File-sharing, Promoting ways to breach academic integrity, and Reuse of previous work.
Read the allegation notice and attached documents carefully.
Consider making an appointment with a DUSA Advocate to discuss the allegation and talk through your options.
The allegation notice will propose a Standard Outcome. Different breach types have different Standard Outcomes. These can be found in Schedule A: Outcomes for Student Breaches of Academic Integrity. The allegation notice will give you the following options:
If you request a review, you can:
Students generally need to respond to the allegation within 5 working days. Information about how to respond and the due date will be provided in the allegation letter.
The Committee may accept a late response from you if:
These are defined in Schedule A: Outcomes for Student Breaches of Academic Integrity (p. 6):
Mitigating circumstances are “exceptional circumstances outside the student’s control faced by the student that impaired their decision-making ability”. Examples include: “severe and acute mental distress” and “being the subject of blackmail or other coercion”.
These are defined in Schedule A: Outcomes for Student Breaches of Academic Integrity (p. 6):
Exacerbating circumstances are “circumstances where a student’s actions are determined to be unethical beyond the nature of the breach in student academic integrity standards”.
Examples include: “the theft of information or devices from another person or student, repeatedly breaching academic integrity, blackmail or coercion, or managing or leading a business or organisation with the purpose to help others breach academic integrity”.
Review meetings usually happen via Zoom video conference. They are attended by either a single-member or a four-member Academic Integrity Committee (and secretariat). You will have the opportunity to talk about your case and the Committee will ask you some questions. You may also ask questions. If you have a support person at your review meeting, they may also be allowed to speak too. Have more questions about review meetings? You can find our Academic Integrity Review Meeting FAQ page here.
Yes, you can. DUSA Advocates often accompany students to review meetings. We can also provide advice about what to expect at the meeting. If you want an Advocate at your meeting, please contact us as soon as possible to arrange this.
If you attend the review meeting, you may be told the outcome at the end of your meeting.
In some cases, the Committee needs further time to deliberate or to gather further information before deciding the outcome. The Committee will email you an outcome letter within 5 working days.
There are several possible outcomes:
Each type of breach has a different Standard Outcome, Mitigating Circumstances Outcome and Exacerbating Circumstances Outcome.
The Committee will consider the information and evidence you provide to them. They will decide whether the allegation is substantiated on the balance of probabilities (whether it is more likely to have occurred or not occurred). If they find a breach has occurred, they will determine what type of breach it is and whether to apply the relevant Standard Outcome, Mitigating Circumstances Outcome or Exacerbating Circumstances Outcome. To learn about the different possible outcomes, see Schedule A: Outcomes for Student Breaches of Academic Integrity and contact DUSA Advocates for individualised advice.
Yes, it may do. If any student involved in the alleged breach requests a review, the allegations against all involved students are reviewed by the Committee (even if you have already accepted the Standard Outcome). If this happens, you will be given the opportunity to respond in writing and/or attend a review meeting. The Committee will consider the other students’ responses alongside your own response. Your outcome may change as a result. DUSA Advocates can provide you with advice and support throughout this process.
It depends on the circumstances. If you are eligible to appeal, you will have 20 working days from the date of being notified of the outcome to lodge an appeal to the University Appeals Committee. Find out more about the appeals process and eligibility here.
The Office of the Dean of Students will keep a record of the allegation, investigation, and outcome. The allegation itself will not be recorded on your academic transcript.
“It was the best decision to contact the DUSA Student Advocacy. My DUSA Advocate very supportive and understanding and helped me comprehend my situation. I felt a whole lot relieved after talking to her.”